archive-nl.com » NL » M » METAFYSICA.NL

Total: 972

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • logic 2 note 16
    principle produced We can play it on an appropriate displaying device But because such a sealing wax record will quickly wear down when repeatedly being played one makes copies of

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_16.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive


  • logic 2 note 18
    decoding encoded information this guarantees objective knowledge But precisely what content out of the many contents of the observed thing is being identified will not be explicitly clear to the observer Eventually many such contents will be so identified that is many contents in the extramental thing will become internalized in the mind And only after repeated observations experiences and comparisons these contents will be as a result of deliberation

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_18.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 19
    other We must show that this is like that of body and soul not an ontological duality in the sense of two domains of fundamentally different ways of being such that they can in principle exist independently of each other Well the logical intention cannot exist apart from that what it intends while that what is intended by a first intention can exist independently of this intention because a certain formal content of it is a corresponding formal content of that what it intends and what is intended is ultimately something which itself cannot intend anything else So the logical intention is in fact not a thing but a relation between things that is between parts of the brain certain brain patterns that embody decoded formal contents and parts of the things that are intended resulting in signification and supposition So the logical intention is reducible to just things like any relation is Accordingly in the contraposition of logical intentions on the one hand and real things on the other there is no ontological dualism involved The temporary brain structure or neural pattern that is to be identified with one of the relata fundaments of the relation of the logical

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_19.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 20
    our account of the development of the concept of crystal that is the development of knowing what a crystal essentially is Part V Via Diffinitionis c The three kinds of

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_20.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 21
    each other Here we must invoke the theory of designation which is an amended version of the scholastic theory of supposition Because it will later be treated in detail we will be very succinct here The term man and the term animal each have their natural intrinsic meaning or signification They refer to a certain nature present in certain things Indeed they are concepts But as soon as these concepts enter into a proposition their meaning can become restricted as a result of now figuring in a propositional context Having their intrinsic signification they designate certain existing individuals where the total of these designated individuals is not necessarily equal to the full extension of the concept In the proposition man is an animal the full extension of the concept man is not restricted because the predicate animal does not impose any limitation on this extension So the actual meaning of the term man as used in this proposition refers to all individual men The intrinsic meaning of the term animal refers to all animals of which all men form a subgroup On the other hand the actual meaning of the term animal as used in that proposition is restricted by

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_21.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 22
    restricted Instead of referring to the whole supposit it refers only to the nature that resides in it as its specific Essence This nature is humanity The intrinsic meaning signification of the term animal extensively refers to all individual animals and intensively refers to the nature animality But the term Socrates referring in our proposition to the nature humanity restricts the meaning of the predicate animal which intensively was animality

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_22.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 23
    sense but an aggregate of such substances It also does not have an intrinsic shape As such it is merely a mereo totality in the broad sense that is a thing in the ordinary sense It can however nevertheless be

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_23.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • logic 2 note 24
    the terms in the proposition While the full extension of the term that is when the term is taken as not being used in a proposition or in any other context tanned is all individual tanned beings the term Socrates restricts the actual scope of the term tanned it restricts it to the individual Socrates only So both the subject term Socrates and the predicate term tanned designate the same

    Original URL path: http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/logic_2_note_24.html (2016-02-01)
    Open archived version from archive



  •